Opposing my argument

\

Picture

My opposing arguments take completely different views on my issue of how the government should be raising awareness about sex trafficking in America. My first opposing is a report of how the government in fighting the crime while my second one is expressing how our entertainment is making the public numb to the issue. 

Picture

The Goodwin G. HUMAN TRAFFICKING  article is about how the government is fighting human trafficking in America. There are a handful of departments that are in control of who gets grant, how much they are awarded, where their services are most needed, and how to properly educate and train the public to help. For example, there is fifteen grants that Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human Service oversee. The grants will be divided between organizations that help track data, keep communication open between law and service, victim services, public awareness and training. 

Picture

In "Finding Safe Harbor: Eliminating The Gap In Colorado's Human Trafficking Laws.", Jessica A. Pingleton argues how the new culture is one of the major causes in the growth of sex trafficking. Pingleton starts off using a major case that should have been a clean win lose due to how a law is worded. The idea is because in the beginning the law went after the victims in hopes of stopping the sex would stop the sex trafficking. Pingleton believes that the law should go after the johns instead of the victims. Pingleton then turns the report to how our culture has excepted words like whore and pimp into not only everyday words but also allows the sex trafficking victims and perpetrator. Even uses examples of Pretty Woman and Snoop Dog.